Support The Podcasts

Think Bigger Think Better is a 100% user-funded podcast that brings together the most inspirational and important thinkers of our time, such as Steven Pinker, having the conversations that matter most, on topics such as fake news, populism, climate change, and blockchain. Your generous support through Patreon helps fund the production of these podcasts and entitles you to monthly Live Ask-Me-Anything dialogs with NewYork Times best-selling authors.

Critical Thinking – a Threat to Society or the Path to Better Living? With Linda Elder

Paul Gibbons on critical thinking

Interested in critical thinking?

Join the Think Bigger Think Better Podcast

Get the latest provocations in science philosphy and business from Paul.

We respect your email privacy

Listen to the Full Episode:

If you travel in educational circles these days, it’s hard not to hear about critical thinking. It seems like a logical answer to the Information Age problems we face today.

The problem with our perception of critical thinking is two-fold: most people think that they do it – applying it to the issues they are bombarded with on a daily basis, and most teachers believe that they already teach it to their students. These folks may or not be right; we explore these problems with today’s guest.

This week, we invited a critical thinking expert, Educational Psychologist Dr. Linda Elder, to the show to set the record straight. In this episode, we explore what critical thinking is, how can we apply it to any issue, how it helps those with opposing views to communicate with one another, and why Texas tried to ban critical thinking in schools.

Dr. Elder is the President of the Foundation for Critical Thinking and the Executive Director for Critical Thinking. She has co-authored 4 books including Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life and 30 Days to Better Thinking and Better Living. Dr. Elder also co-authored 24 Thinker’s Guides on critical thinking.

Don’t miss this important conversation about the importance of understanding, employing, and encouraging critical thinking in our society today.

What You’ll Learn from this Episode:

  • What critical thinking is all about.
  • Dr. Elder’s historical perspective on the subject.
  • Whether most teachers really do teach critical thinking to their students.
  • How we can become better deconstructing reasoning in every part of human life.
  • The essential elements of the critical thinking model and the best approaches to teach them.
  • How we can get people to use the abstract foundational models of critical thinking.
  • How one may apply critical thinking to reading the news.
  • Why critical thinking may be considered a threat to society.

Featured on the Show:

Enjoy The Show?

10 thoughts on “Critical Thinking – a Threat to Society or the Path to Better Living? With Linda Elder

  1. Your conversation with Dr. Linda Elder was excellent, thank you for focusing on not only on the subject of critical thinking, but on real ways to work on our own skills to better thinking.

    1. I don’t think it does. Or, at least, a few people have downloaded it – and this is the first I’ve heard of it. If, after having another try, it still does that – make sure you ping my back.

  2. I never get tired of hearing about the FCT approach to critical thinking. I have been actively studying and teaching (to the best of my ability) this paradigm for the past several years, and I learn something new each time I encounter someone talking about it. Great podcast!

    1. I am so happy you are happy! If you’d like to win one of the authors’ books, go to (podcast reviews)… Would love to send you one!!

  3. Gibbons misunderstands what the Texas law was in fact doing. And you pass on that misunderstanding to Elder. What the Texas law was aiming at, was a repackaged program–they were not aiming at critical thinking itself. In fact, what they wanted was GENUINE critical thinking, not something repackaged in a word salad that was already rejected. What they were truly reacting to in their legislation, was sophistry. To discover that you had to actually read the legislation itself, not the news stories surrounding it, which willfully distorted was was actually there.

    1. Grateful for your comment. I did read the legislation, it seemed to use critical thinking pejoratively – as an attack on values, as a “closet” attack on religion. That is interpretation though. Do you have an example of the repackaged word salad? I’d love to take a look! If I have indeed got this wrong, would be immensely grateful for further illumination.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have snippets of insight delivered throughout the day.


My latest podcasts on philosophy, science, and change delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to Paul

Get the latest provocations in science philosphy and business from Paul.

We respect your email privacy


My latest videos covering keynotes, book previews, and podcasts.


Thoughtful discussions on the greatest challenges facing our businesses and leaders today.


Connect with Paul

On Twitter

On Youtube

On Facebook



By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website

Download Media Kit

View Media Kit